Apollo with Chronos, that’s just as difficult for 2x slomo because the benchmarks only do 4x - which flatters the Apollos. That’s for upscaling - but also, comparing slomo and e.g. Well that’s a lot, and I am sure there is a logical reason for it - but it doesn’t help to maintain confidence in the software claims and makes GPU/CPU combination comparisons very very difficult (you should see my spreadsheet!).Īssuming that others see this too, it seems to me that the benchmark program needs to be re-done to better reflect real world conditions. With my Ryzen 7 5800x system and whatever GPU (3060 ti and 4080 specifically) my real world upscaling with Artemis is maybe 30% or so slower than indicated by the benchmarks, with everything else turned off including detail recovery, and audio set to none. The Benchmark obviously does not reflect a real world workload. Please upload problem videos and logs here: Submit Files.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |